Andrew B. Zezas, SIOR
Relationship Manager,
Strategist, President
(908) 245-5999 x11
andrew.zezas@realstrat.com

Hidden Dangers of Net vs Gross Rents
(Part One)

So, how's your net lease doing these days? Or, do you have a gross lease? Do you know? Do you even care? Well, perhaps you should!

When most companies lease commercial real estate, they hire attorneys and brokers to negotiate the heck out of the lease document. Then, they most often attain corporate approval, sign the lease, and then turn it over to accounting and never look at it again ...until a problem arises. We recently represented a company in their acquisition of an office space lease for their new headquarters, and the landlord presented us with a 96 page lease! Given how lengthy commercial real estate leases have become, the desire to finish them and move on is understandable, but potentially dangerous.

All too often companies pay little attention to the component cost structure of real estate leases, beyond the rental rate and construction costs. Operating expenses and property taxes can comprise from twenty to as much as sixty percent of annual occupancy cost payments. Given that fact, more companies could reduce costs and increase profits by focusing on how operating expenses are treated and how the structure of their leases could enhance or impede their ability to control occupancy costs. This is true whether the rents are structured on a gross or net basis.

The devil is in the details, as they say. Well, that's also true in commercial real estate leases. On the surface, the differences between gross and net leases may appear to be subtle. But, buried underneath is the answer as to which structure is most appropriate for your company's occupancy.

Gross leases, as they are often called, are typically all inclusive or full service structures, where all or most of a building's operating expenses are built into the rental rate. In gross leases, operating expenses are most often calculated utilizing a base year or expense stop. Under the base year concept, a time period is selected (usually a calendar year, but the particular time period can be negotiated) to serve as the base costs which the landlord will bear. After the base year expires, or once the operating expenses rise above the base year costs, the tenant would be responsible to pay for the incremental difference. Few leases provide for a cap on increases, and most leases do not provide the tenant with a credit in the event of an operating cost decline. These two critical danger zones create little or no incentive for the landlord to reduce costs or operate the building on a fiscally efficient basis. In fact, most leases provide de facto incentives for landlords to regularly increase operating costs, so as to enhance operating profits. Under the expense stop concept, the tenant pays all operating cost increments above a set dollar amount (the expense stop base).

Accurately setting the base year or expense stop base is an important component to controlling the operating expense portion of a company's occupancy costs. Prior to executing a lease, it is imperative to clearly define allowable and excluded operating costs, how those costs are treated over the short and long term, over which time period they may be amortized, and how repairs and capital expenditures are treated, are all critical components of controlling occupancy costs.

Net leases offer a different structure that contains its own cost centers and danger zones. I'll explore net leases in detail and draw comparative conclusions between the two structures in part two of this article, which will appear in the November issue of “Business, Profits and Strategy”. Below is a brief explanation of some of the differences between Gross versus Net lease structures.

Gross Leases (with base year or expense stop)

  • An all inclusive cost structure, but subject to variation
  • Traditionally used for multi-story office buildings. Occasionally used in single story office buildings and, in a modified form for industrial buildings.
  • Usually provides cost increase protection for tenant for a set time period through either a base year or expense stop formula
  • Tenant could have less control over operating cost increases vs a net lease
  • Base year formula (set period of time used to calculate maximum costs to be borne by landlord-typically first calendar year during which lease commences. Could be any time period agreed to by landlord and tenant) or;
  • Expense stop formula (set dollar amount borne by landlord over which tenant pays- if set too low, could result in accelerated tenant cost increases)
  • Usually includes a formula for operating expense exclusions
  • Landlord can generate additional profits by providing services
  • May require more administration by landlord
  • Operating expenses typically higher than under Net leases.
  • Typically associated with multi-tenant, multi-story office buildings
  • Could have varying local definitions, i.e.: gross + te, gross + electric/utilities, modified gross, etc.


Net Leases

  • Tenant pays for all costs above a net rental rate
  • Day one operating expense increase potential
  • Some net leases provide tenant with more control over operating cost increases
  • May require more administration and cost management by tenant
  • Landlord can generate additional profits by providing services
  • Doesn't typically include a formula for operating cost exclusions as extensive as that typically found in gross leases, but exclusions may be achieved through negotiations prior to lease execution
  • Traditionally employed in one story office flex, light industrial buildings (multi-tenant). Net leases are becoming more common in newly constructed Class A multi-story office buildings
  • May require less administration by landlord
  • Could have varying local definitions, i.e.: triple net, double net, usually means some cost(s) is not included in rents and is an additional charge above rents

Andrew B. Zezas, SIOR, is Relationship Manager, Strategist, and President & CEO of Real Estate Strategies Corporation, Publisher of "Business, Profits and Strategy", a monthly online publication read by thousands of business, financial, and real estate executives nationally, and, is the author of two new real estate books, The CFO's Guide to Understanding Corporate Real Estate Transactions and The CFO's Guide to Hiring the "Right" Real Estate Service Provider, both of which will be available shortly at www.thecfosguide.com.

Mr. Zezas is well-known for his ease and informative style of public speaking, and has given talks, presentations, and has lead educational programs for business, professional, government, and trade associations, including the Building Owners and Managers Association, American Management Association, the U.S. Postal Service, RealComm, Society of Industrial and Office Realtors (SIOR), and others. Andrew is National Chairman of the SIOR Tenant Representation Specialty Practice Board, and is a licensed real estate instructor in Texas and Indiana. He can be reached at 908 245 5999 or via email.

Real Estate Strategies Corporation, located in Kenilworth, New Jersey, and serving clients throughout the country, helps companies create and execute Business DRIVEN Real Estate Solutions...and Opportunities, faster and with less risk. Visit www.realstrat.com.

Read other business, real estate, and finance articles written by RealStrat's experts.

Copyright Real Estate Strategies Corporation 2007 - All rights reserved. Reproduction or distribution in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

THIS WORK IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE PRACTICAL AND USEFUL INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT MATTER COVERED. HOWEVER, IT IS SOLD AND/OR PROVIDED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE AUTHOR AND THE PUBLISHER ARE NOT ENGAGED IN RENDERING LEGAL, FINANCIAL, ACCOUNTING OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVICE TO THE READER. IF LEGAL, FINANCIAL, ACCOUNTING OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVICE IS REQUIRED, THE SERVICES OF A COMPETENT PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE SOUGHT. THE AUTHOR AND THE PUBLISHER SPECIFICALLY AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ANY LIABILITY THAT MAY BE INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE USE OR APPLICATION OF THE INFORMATION THAT IS CONTAINED IN THIS WORK.